|
Yakima River Basin Water Projects |
|
|
CAG Transfer Guidelines A.
Basic Criteria (Principles) and some conditions for “fast track”
response to transfer request be articulated including: 1. Equivalent
reductions in consumptive use §
Maintain
neutrality to TWSA §
Land
has to remain dry for the period of transfer 2. Water
that would have been used if not for transfer §
Intent
has a lot to do with this. It is
not a fast process if intent is questioned §
There
are clear criteria that can be developed that deal with intent §
Transferring
a water right for a year is still beneficial use §
Following
lands – easy transferability of right §
Due
diligence prior to the transaction. May
include use of a "Chinese" wall. 3. Transfer
must adhere to specific delivery schedule §
Water
has to be available at the sellers/donors point of diversion at the time of use
at the location the water is being transferred to. Some rights are not full season rights §
Districts
should submit a map with transfer requests 4. Must be
no adverse change in instream flow [3] §
Adverse
- depends on where it is and when. Time
and location is everything. May be
trade off issue - e.g. net benefit to fish and others.
Technical criteria can be articulated concerning time and location §
Need
specific group to advise Bureau of Reclamation/DOE on these criteria.
A CAG working Group has been formed for this purpose. The group includes
representatives of the Bureau of Reclamation, WA Department of Ecology, WA
Department of Fish and Wildlife, Yakama Indian Nation, US Fish and Wildlife
Service, National Marine Fisheries Service. §
Would
be "easier" if there were adopted flow criteria 5. Operational Impacts B. Develop and agree to technical details that support the principles §
What
do you need to know to answer the questions that apply to the criteria?
This helps to guide the EA and consultation with Bureau, Fish and
Wildlife and NMFS. §
What
blanket statements can be made in EA that speed up the analysis? §
Technical
requirements developed, on the ground, in 2001 should be documented for longer
term reference and use C. Develop scenarios that describe the technical criteria
Eight scenarios were identified in which to consider fundamental criteria
1. Main stem to main stem
[1] Not exclusive and not to preclude other possible options [2] Apply to 2001 drought year only - not tied to the future. |
|
Project facilitation and webpage design by Roundtable Associates, Seattle WA |